networkdesigner.net
|
Home | Free Practice Tests | TopSites | Advertisers | GuestBook | Link to usPrivacy Policy |
Networkdesigner.net
Networkdesigner.net
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
 
 All Forums
 CCNP and CCDP
 Solve Subnet Mask Question
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
 
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
paul judge
New Member



1 Posts
Posted - Jan 07 2002 :  6:49:00 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
This a question of the day that was recently posted.
I can not see how they got the answer that they stae e.g sumnet mask 255.248.0.0
For example :
Class A is 0 -to- 127 Default subnet mask 255.0.0.0
Class B is 128 -to 191 Default subnet mask 255.255.0.0
Class C is 192 -to- 223 Default subnet mask 255.255.255.0

I think that subnet mask 255.255.254.0 would be correct.
Giving a host range of 512 per subnet.

If you have an answer please show all your working-out and progress the answer.


Q. You have the following IP address ranges:

160.216.140.0 - 160.216.140.254
160.208.118.0 - 160.208.118.254
160.208.119.0 - 160.208.119.254
160.200.93.0 - 160.200.93.254
160.200.94.0 - 160.200.94.254

Which of the following subnet masks will grant you

A) 255.248.0.0
B) 255.255.255.0
C) 255.224.0.0
D) 255.255.240.0

Correct Answer(s): A) 255.248.0.0

Explanation:

Correct answer(s): a.
This subnet divides the available addresses into three subnet groups meeting the required nodes per subnet.

Wrong: b, c, d.
These subnets do not divide the available addresses into three subnet groups.

Jsteve
Junior Member



4 Posts
Posted - Jan 09 2002 :  7:23:44 PM  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Only in classfull subnetting are you restricted to stick with the
subnet defaults.

In a classless subnetting your are not restricted to the default
mask boundaries.

The A answer is correct because if you look at the second octet of all you ranges, you can determine that the mask subnetting is done in this octet which eliminates answers b & C

Secondly, you can see that the second octet increments by 8.
so the low order bit in 224 is 32
and the low order bit in 248 is 8 (which is what the second octet is incremented by)


Go to Top of Page

   
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:

Networkdesigner.net

© 1999 - 2002 Networkdesigner.net

Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000

| Free Practice Tests | TopSites | Advertisers | Contact | Terms | Privacy Policy |

Disclaimer

The material on this web site is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco Systems, Inc. CISCO® is a registered trademark of Cisco Systems, Inc.; CCNA™, CCDA™, CCNP™, CCDP™, CCIE™, CISCO CERTIFIED NETWORK ASSOCIATE™, CISCO CERTIFIED DESIGN ASSOCIATE™, CISCO CERTIFIED NETWORK PROFESSIONAL™, CISCO CERTIFIED DESIGN PROFESSIONAL™, CISCO CERTIFIED INTERNETWORK EXPERT™ are distinctive trademarks used by Cisco to describe its certifications and examinations in the United States and certain other countries. All other trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners.

Questions, comments? Email the . Copyright © 1999, 2000, 2001  Network Designer.  All rights reserved. study guides, practice tests, and/or material is copyright material and may not be redistributed in any way unless otherwise stated and is not sponsored by, endorsed by or affiliated with Cisco© Systems, Inc or any other company.   All trademarks are trademarks of their respective owners.